Mahipal v. Incharge Distt. Judge and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the petition even during the revised call.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the petition even during the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 746 of 2010
Petitioner :- Mahipal Respondent :- Incharge Distt. Judge & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nipun Singh
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
No one appears to press the writ petition even in the revised call.
It is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J)
Order Date :- 9.1.2019 SL
Mahipal
Incharge Distt. Judge & Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court