In this revised Writ Petition filed by Sudhansu Kumar Rai, the High Court, though served with nominal endeavour, ultimately dismissed the petition as infructuous due to the petitioner's absence and apparent lack of interest.
Petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 70661 of 2005
Petitioner :- Sudhansu Kumar Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Principal Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.B. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 19.11.2019 Prajapati
Sudhansu Kumar Rai
State Of U.P. Thru Principal Secy. And Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
