Noted against the dismissed writ petition for want of prosecution due to non-appearance in the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6859 of 2006
Petitioner :- Rajiv Nandan Upadhyaya Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
None appeared to press this petition even in the revised call.
It is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 9.12.2019 Chandan
Rajiv Nandan Upadhyaya
State of U.P.
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
