Kushalpal Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Cane Commissioner and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged payment of retirement dues. Counsel submitted the Society made payment and the writ petition became infructuous. Court recorded the submission without substantive analysis. (3 lines)
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5798 of 2018
Petitioner :- Kushalpal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Cane Commissioner And 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Mehra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ravindra Singh
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard Shri Atul Mehra, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
Shri Mehra submits that payment of retiral dues has been made by the Society in question.
The writ petition has become infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.3.2019 A.N. Mishra
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding payment of retirement dues by the Society has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kushalpal Singh
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/5798/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court