The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear to press the matter. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 26
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 56949 of 2010
Petitioner :- Dayanand Inter College Saidnagali Respondent :- Irfan Ali Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishnu Sahai,K. D. Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- Anand Kr. Srivastava,Sharad Srivastava
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
List has been revised. No one appears for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 10.4.2019 Pratima
(Dr.Y.K.Srivastava,J.)
Dayanand Inter College Saidnagali
Irfan Ali
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
