The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a selection process. The court held that the petitioner failed to explain the evident and inordinate laches regarding a process initiated in 2008.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5060 of 2019
Petitioner :- Karvindar Singh Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raghvendra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.C. Upadhyay learned Brief Holder for the State.
The claim in the instant writ petition rests on a selection process which was initiated in 2008. There is no explanation for the evident and inordinate laches.
The petition is dismissed on that score.
Order Date :- 4.4.2019 faraz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed or dismissed due to inordinate laches in a selection process initiated in 2008.
Karvindar Singh
State Of UP
2 Others
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
