The High Court allowed an application for withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 34347 of 2017. The petitioner filed an affidavit seeking withdrawal, and the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on 8.8.2019.
Withdrawal application No. 2 of 2018 allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34347 of 2017
Petitioner :- Devendra Kumar Posti Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Srivastava,Anil Bhushan,Neelabh Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hridai Narain Pandey,Ritvik Upadhya
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard Sri Amit Kumar Srivastav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents.
This is an application for withdrawal of the writ petition filed by the petitioner. The application is supported by an affidavit of the petitioner namely SriDevendra Kumar Posti.
I have perused the contents made in the application as well as affidavit.
In view of the same, the withdrawal application No.2 of 2018 is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This order is passed in the presence of Sri V.K. Upadhya learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Ritvik Upadhya, learned counsel for respondent No.4 and Sri H.N. Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No.5.
Order Date :- 8.8.2019 saqlain
Devendra Kumar Posti
State Of U.P.
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
