The Hon'ble Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Kamlesh Kumar on the ground of alternative remedy. The petitioner could have filed an appeal under Section 89 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the State Road Transport Authority instead of approaching the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2785 of 2019
Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bajarang Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 22.2.2019 Akram
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to relief when an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 89 exists.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamlesh Kumar
State Of U P
2 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
