Writ petition called in revise was dismissed by the Single Judge as the cause of action may not survive or the matter became infructuous, abating further proceedings due to the petitioner's absence and lack of interest.
The writ petition was dismissed and any interim order, if any, stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 26014 of 2003
Petitioner :- Laxmi Prakash
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Principal Secy. Panchayat Raj And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.M. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 11.11.2019 KA
Laxmi Prakash
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
