Bhullan Ram challenged an advertisement issued by respondents. The Court found no justification to entertain the petition as the petitioner claimed membership of the Committee of Management. The writ petition was dismissed.
The writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1461 of 2019
Petitioner :- Bhullan Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Piyush Kant Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.
Undisputedly the petitioner claims to be a member of the Committee of Management. In that view of the matter, the Court finds no justification in law to entertain this petition at his behest challenging an advertisement issued by the respondents.
The writ petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 29.1.2019 faraz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging an advertisement is maintainable when the petitioner claims to be a member of the Committee of Management.
Bhullan Ram
State Of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
