The Court recalled an application for dismissal of the writ petition and restored the petition. The Court then heard the main writ petition dismissing the claim for salary upgradation on the ground of limitation and manifest error.
Writ petition dismissed; claim petition rejected on grounds of limitation and manifest error.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10627 of 2013
Petitioner :- Aqil Rasheed Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Principal Secretary And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K.Pandey,Awadhesh Kumar Sharma,R.K.Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
(C.M. Recall Application No. 4 of 2018)
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
12.04.2018, whereby the writ petition was dismissed.
Order Date :- 22.1.2019 AK
Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10627 of 2013 Petitioner :- Aqil Rasheed Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Principal Secretary And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K.Pandey,Awadhesh Kumar Sharma,R.K.Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
08.01.2008 and claim petition was apparently barred by limitation.
find any manifest error in impugned judgment.
Order Date :- 22.1.2019 AK
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the claim petition for salary upgradation filed by the petitioner was barred by limitation.
Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that the claim petition was barred by limitation due to the nature of the impugned order.
Whether any manifest error existed in the impugned judgment of the State Public Service Tribunal.
Aqil Rasheed
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Ifaqat Ali Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
