The court dismissed this PIL for seeking remedy for alleged land encroachment, holding that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy available under the U.P. Revenue Code 2006.
The Public Interest Litigation was dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 929 of 2019
Petitioner :- Mahendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019 Akram
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the current petition is maintainable as a writ petition given the availability of an alternative statutory remedy.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahendra Kumar
State Of U P
Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
