In a lack of instructions from counsel, the Single Judge dismissed the Sales/Trade Tax revision petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 268 of 2013
Applicant :- M/S Shakti Enterprisees Railway Road Meerut Opposite Party :- M/S Commissioner Commercial Tax U.P. Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Suyash Agarwal,Rakesh Ranjan Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ashok Kumar,J.
Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the revisionist has stated that he has no instructions to appear on behalf of the revisionist.
In view of the aforesaid, the revision petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Order Date :- 22.4.2019 S.S.
M/S Shakti Enterprisees
Ashok Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
