Commissioner Commercial Tax filed a revision against a taxing authority's decision. The application was dismissed as redundant as it was covered by a previously decided similar revision, Sales/Trade Tax Revision No. 378 of 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 755 of 2013
Applicant :- The Commissioner Commercial Tax Opposite Party :- M/S Madan Agricultue Industries Indusrial Estate Deoband Counsel for Applicant :- S.C. Counsel for Opposite Party :- Nishant Mishra
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard Shri B.K. Pandey, learned counsel for revisionistState and Shri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for respondent-assessee.
Shri Pandey submits that the matter is covered by Sales/Trade Tax Revision No.378 of 2013, The Commissioner, commercial Tax versus M/S Kansal Industries .
The aforesaid revision is also decided in terms of the said judgment.
The revision stands dismissed .
Order Date :- 13.3.2019 A.N. Mishra
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
The Commissioner, commercial Tax versus M/S Kansal IndustriesReferred¶6
Sales/Trade Tax Revision No.378 of 2013, The Commissioner, commercial Tax versus M/S Kansal Industries
The Commissioner Commercial Tax
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
