The Special Appeal and Condonation Application filed by the appellant, Shyamwati, were dismissed. The Court held the application dismissed for want of prosecution and the appeal barred by limitation.
The Special Appeal was dismissed for being barred by limitation. The Condonation Application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 1075 of 2010
Appellant :- Shyamwati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Siddharth Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
C. M. Delay Condonation Application No.343706 of 2010
Order Date :- 12.4.2019 Manish Himwan
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 1075 of 2010
Appellant :- Shyamwati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Siddharth Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
The application, seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal, having been dismissed vide order of date, this appeal, being barred by limitation, is also dismissed.
Order Date :- 12.4.2019 Manish Himwan
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condonation application should be allowed given the dismissal for want of prosecution.
Whether the appeal is barred by limitation.
Shyamwati
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
