The appellant in Special Appeal No. 66 of 2000 was absent and failed to press the appeal. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 66 of 2000
Appellant :- Surendra Singh Rawat Respondent :- The Director Of Local Body, U.P. And Others Counsel for Appellant :- S.N.Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Virendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 24.5.2019 Saurabh
Surendra Singh Rawat
The Director Of Local Body, U.P
Sudhir Agarwal
Virendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
