Special Appeal No. 441 of 2002 filed by M/S Bucheye Batteries Ltd. challenging a single judge order under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 is dismissed for lack of substantial issue and manifest error.
Special Appeal No. 441 of 2002 is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 441 of 2002
Appellant :- M/S Bucheye Batteries P.Ltd. On Behalf Of Khalid Mukhtar Respondent :- Official Liquidator Attached To The High Court Ald. And Others
Counsel for Appellant :- Manish Goyal,Ankita Jain Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anurag Khanna, Ashish Mishra, M.N.Singh, Pranjal Mehrotra, R.P. Agarwal, Raj Kumar Singh Chauhan
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 28.1.2019 Siddhant Sahu
1 issue framed by the court
whether there is a substantial question of law or manifest error to reverse the Single Judge's judgment dismissing the Section 446 application
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Bucheye Batteries P.Ltd. On Behalf Of Khalid Mukhtar
Official Liquidator Attached To The High Court
Ald. And Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
