Semia appellate order dismissing an appeal called in revision for want of prosecution due to non-appearance by the appellants. No substantive disposal of the plea is indicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 1246 of 2006
Appellant :- Employees State Insurance Corporation And Another Respondent :- U.P. State Road Transport Corporation And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Pramod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Samir Sharma,Vrindavan Mishra
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 26.3.2019 I.A.Siddiqui
Employees State Insurance Corporation
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
