This court dismissed Second Appeal No. 141 of 1993 in default due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel. The list was revised, and any interim order was vacated.
Appeal dismissed in default due to absence of counsel for the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 22
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 141 of 1993
Appellant :- Ratan Prakash Respondent :- Sushil Kumar Counsel for Appellant :- Rajiv Gupta
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised.
No one appeared for the appellant.
The appeal is dismissed in default due to absence of counsel for the appellant.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 18.1.2019 Satyam
Ratan Prakash
Sushil Kumar
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
