This writ petition challenged detention under the National Security Act. The court held the petition infructuous as the statutory one-year detention period had expired and dismissed it.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 42
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 6145 of 2017
Petitioner :- Anuj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Raj Kumari Devi
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-IX,J.
Case called out. Smt. Raj Kumari Devi is present for Union of India. The learned AGA is present for the State.
This habeas corpus petition arises out of detention order dated 20.10.2016 approved by order dated 27.10.2016 and confirmed by order dated 13.01.2017 thereby detaining the corpus under the provisions of the National Security Act.
As the maximum period of detention, that is of one year, has already expired, the petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 5.7.2019 AKShukla/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the habeas corpus petition regarding National Security Act detention should be disposed of given the expiration of the maximum detention period?
Anuj
State Of U.P.
Manoj Misra
Anil Kumar-Ix
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
