State of U.P. filed a Section 378 Cr.P.C. appeal challenging the acquittal of eight accused persons in a case involving assault and land dispute under Sections 148 IPC and the SC/ST Act. The High Court found the acquittal not perverse.
Leave to appeal rejected and Government appeal dismissed at the admission stage with no interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- GOVERNMENT APPEAL No. - 3188 of 2008
Appellant :- State Of U.P. Respondent :- Har Prasad And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Order Date :- 6.5.2019 P.P.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the lower Court's acquittal was illegal, perverse, or devoid of jurisdictional error requiring interference.
Whether sufficient evidence was on record to sustain the prosecution's version against the accused.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
State Of U.P.
Har Prasad And Others
Aniruddha Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
