An application for condonation of delay was allowed. On merits of the appeal under the Family Courts Act dismissed as the alleged minor had attained majority, rendering the guardianship dispute infructuous.
Delay in filing appeal was condoned; appeal on merits was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.1 of 2019
In
Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 256 of 2019
Appellant :- Rekha Respondent :- Sri Sunil Kumar Counsel for Appellant :- Ashwini Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 1.10.2019 Ashish Pd.
Court No. - 34
C ase :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 256 of 2019
Appellant :- Rekha Respondent :- Sri Sunil Kumar Counsel for Appellant :- Ashwini Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal regarding guardianship is maintainable after the alleged minor has attained majority.
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rekha
Sri Sunil Kumar
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
