The court dismissed an appeal against an order awarding interim maintenance and litigation expenses under the Hindu Marriage Act. The court held that the lump sum for litigation expenses could not be termed excessive or unjust, finding the appeal lacked merit.
Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 509 of 2019
Appellant :- Tushar Pratap Tiwari Respondent :- Smt. Kshma Tripathi Counsel for Appellant :- K.K. Tripathi
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 15.7.2019 Siddhant Sahu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an interim award of lump sum amount for litigation expenses is excessive and unjust.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Tushar Pratap Tiwari
Smt. Kshma Tripathi
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
