The bench found the appeal defective due to non-appearance and procedural lapse, directing transmission to the District Judge and disposing the matter.
Transmission of appeal to the District Judge and dismissal of the present appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 297 of 1996
Appellant :- Raj Mani Dubey Respondent :- Smt. Preeti Singh And Another Counsel for Appellant :- B.B. Paul
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
On 29.7.2019, learned counsel for the appellant was not present.
The appeal was already returned to be presented before the District Judge was the order of the Division Bench of this Court dated 5.7.1996 despite that the office has kept the matter here.
In view of the above, the appeal be transmitted to the District Judge concerned.
This appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 8.8.2019 DKS
Raj Mani Dubey
Smt. Preeti Singh
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
