The High Court dismissed a first appeal filed by appellants for default due to the absent appellant's counsel. The stay order, if any, stood vacated.
Appeal dismissed for default; stay order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 66 of 1990
Appellant :- Aminuddin And Others Respondent :- Massroor Ahmad And Others Counsel for Appellant :- S.Farman Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- A.K.Shukla
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
This is an appeal of the year 1990 preferred by the claimants- appellants.
Sri A.K. Shukla for the respondents is present.
Despite several adjournments are being granted to Sri S. Farman Ahmad, he has absented himself on 25.9.2019 and even today.
I have no other option but to dismiss the appeal for default.
Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for default.
Stay order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 15.10.2019 Irshad
Aminuddin And Others
Massroor Ahmad And Others
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
