Dismissed
N.I.A. Co. v. Smt. Shahida Begam
Allahabad HCFAFO/369/1992
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed because no representative appeared to press the matter, resulting in dismissal for want of prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 33
¶2
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 369 of 1992
¶3
Appellant :- N.I.A. Co. Respondent :- Smt. Shahida Begam Counsel for Appellant :- V.M.Sahai
¶4
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
¶5
- Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of appellant to press this appeal.
¶6
- Appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶7
- Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
¶8
Order Date :- 6.8.2019 Mukesh
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
N.I.A. Co.
- respondent
Smt. Shahida Begam
Coram
AI extract
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAFO/369/1992
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court