This Court is not in agreement with the submission made by learned counsel for the respondent that the multiplier and the income of the injured cannot be disturbed. However, the Tribunal has not granted any amount under the head of attendant charges, special diet and for future medicine, the consolidated amount of Rs.22,000/- was granted and the Tribunal granted only Rs.40,000 with 6% rate of interest, namely, Rs.18000/- for future loss of income to Devendra, who was 22 years of age and had fixed income. However, it was not proved that he was in employement and, therefore, notional future loss of income would have to be considered and, therefore, 40% addition to the income of Rs.2000 being a driver in the year of accident, namely, 2001 would meet the end of justice. Thus, Rs.3000/- would be the annual income of the injured. He had 20% functional disability. Hence, Rs.600 x 12 x 18 = Rs.1,29,600/- would be the future loss of income which was not awarded would accrue for his benefit as per the judgment of the Apex Court in Syed Sadiq Etc Vs. Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company, 2014 (1) TAC 369 and the judgment of the undersigned as relied by the counsel for the appellant in First Appeal From Order No. 3199 of 2004 (Hari Babu Vs. Amrit Lal and Others) decided on 4.4.2019 and the interest would be 9% from the date of filing of the claim petition till the award and 6% thereafter till the amount is deposited.
