The Hon'ble Harsh Kumar, J. dismissed a first appeal filed by Prem Kishore Sharma for want of prosecution. The appellant had no instructions despite being informed. The interim order stands vacated. Order date: 10.5.2019.
First appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1930 of 2001
Appellant :- Prem Kishore Sharma Respondent :- Yad Ram And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Dhruv Narayana, ,Janmed Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- V.D. Agarwal,Dinesh Raghav,Smt. S. Agarwal
Hon'ble Harsh Kumar,J.
Shri Janmed Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Abhijit Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Dinesh Raghav, learned counsel for respondent No.1 are present.
Learned counsel for appellant submits that he has no instructions from appellant despite informing him twice by registered post.
In the circumstances, appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 10.5.2019 T. Sinha
Prem Kishore Sharma
Yad Ram
Harsh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
