High Court Court No. 17 dismissed a criminal revision filed by Gaj Ram as time-barred due to a 27-day delay. The condonation application was rejected, and the interim order was vacated.
Revision dismissed as time-barred; condonation application rejected; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 352 of 2001
Revisionist :- Gaj Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- K.D. Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
List revised. Revisionist or his counsel is not present. Learned A.G.A. is present.
As per office report, there is 27 days delay in filing the revision.
In the light of the above, Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application is, hereby rejected for non prosecution. Revision is also dismissed as being time barred.
Let it be consigned to the record.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
A copy of this order be communicated to the court below for necessary compliance.
Order Date :- 27.3.2019
Vibha Singh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision is maintainable in light of the 27 days delay in filing the same.
Gaj Ram
State Of U.P.
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
