By the order impugned, the learned Magistrate has rejected the said application, saying that the case has been decided by his predecessor on 23.02.2000, and consigned to the record room, and, therefore, the learned Magistrate has no jurisdiction to entertain that application. It is well settled that a criminal court does not have any jurisdiction whatsoever to review its judgement except to the limited extent of correction of a clerical or arithmetic error, within the parameters of Section 362 Cr.P.C. Certainly, a criminal court has no jurisdiction to recall a judgement entered on merits, be it in the absence of a party, or opportunity to lead evidence. The tenor of the grounds taken, in support of the present revision, which the Court has examined at length with the assistance of the learned AGA show, that the revisionist has come up with a case of denial of opportunity to lead evidence in support of the prosecution, as he never got information of the date fixed before the trial court, being in the service of the Air-force ,and posted out to different stations. In case, the revisionist had found it to be a case of denial of opportunity, he could have challenge the judgement of acquittal dated 23.02.2000 before this Court, which is not the case