This court disposed of a criminal revision petition as infructuous because the sole revisionist had died seven to eight years prior to the filing of the list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1893 of 1998
Revisionist :- Chhote Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- R.D.Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
List revised. None appeared on behalf of revisionist.
As per report dated 30.03.2019 of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, sole revisionist of this case namely Chhote Lal has been died seven to eight years ago. As the sole revisionist of this case, has been died, revision becomes infructuous.
Revision is disposed of as infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.4.2019 Vibha Singh
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
