This order concerns Criminal Revision No. 1709 of 2003. The revisionist failed to appear, leading the court to dismiss the revision for want of prosecution and vacate any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1709 of 2003
Revisionist :- Mahesh Chand Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- V.K. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appears for revisionist.
Revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 1.7.2019 HSM
Mahesh Chand
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
