In a Criminal Revision presented by Sant Lal Sharma against an acquittal, the bench found no one present to press the matter. The revision was dismissed for want of prosecution at the admission stage.
Revision dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1407 of 2001 Revisionist :- Sant Lal Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Satish Dwivedi,Mayank Bhushan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Case taken up in the revised list. No one is present to press this revision. Learned A.G.A. is present.
This revision has been filed against the judgment of acquittal passed by IXth Additional Chief Judicial Magitrate, Agra, in Criminal Case No. 396 of 2000 (State vs. Pankaj and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 34 of 1994, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506, 352 I.P.C., Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Agra.
It appears that this revision has been filed in the year 2001 and is still awaiting admission.
As no one is present to press this revision in the revised list, the revision is dismissed for want of prosecution at the admission stage.
Interim order of any stands vacated.
Order Date :- 10.12.2019 sailesh
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
