No petitioner present. Petitioner failed to deposit amount at mediation center. Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order vacated.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order if any stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8910 of 2019
Petitioner :- Neeraj Kaushik And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sudhir Kant Dixit
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition. Sri Sudhir Kant Dixit, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and Sri A.R. Chaurasia, learned A.G.A. for the State, are present.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the matter was referred to Mediation Center to deposit the amount but the same has not been deposited by the petitioners.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Raj Beer Singh, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 24.7.2019 A. Tripathi
Neeraj Kaushik
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
