None appeared for the petitioner. The State's Advocate General submitted the investigation is concluded with a final report filed, rendering the writ petition infructuous. The petition was dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7944 of 2019
Petitioner :- Shilpa And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava,Mohd. Naushad Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Mahendra Kumar,Mahendra Pratap
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition. Sri A.K.Sand, learned AGA for the State and Sri Mahendra Prakash, learned counsel for respondent no.3 are present.
Learned AGA has filed a counter affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record.
Learned AGA has submitted that investigation of the case has been concluded and final report has been submitted in the present case, the said fact has been mentioned in paragraph no.5 of the counter affidavit, hence the present petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Raj Beer Singh,J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 17.7.2019 NS
Shilpa And Another
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
