In a criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed for non-prosecution, the court dismissed the matter due to the petitioners' failure to take steps to serve the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6463 of 2019
Petitioner :- Jan Mohammad And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lokesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
The case has been called out in the revised list.
No one has appeared to press this petition.
Office has submitted a report that the petitioners have not taken steps to serve the respondent no.4.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019 m.a.
Jan Mohammad And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Manoj Misra
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
