Partly allowed

Kiran Kumari and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC20 Dec 2019CRLP/26138/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal writ petition challenging an FIR for kidnapping and trafficking by marriage. The court refused to quash the FIR but directed age verification via medical examination and imposed non-arrest conditions pending investigation completion.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to quash FIR refused. Female petitioner ordered for age verification; male petitioner released non-arrested upon cooperating with investigation.

Kiran Kumari and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 46

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 26138 of 2019

¶3

Petitioner :- Kiran Kumari And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A.

¶6

By means of the present writ petition, the the petitioners have invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 13.12.2019 registered as Case Crime No. 0754 of 2019, under Sections 363, 366 IPC, P.S. Ajeetmal, district Auraiya.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners has identified the petitioner nos.1 & 2, namely, Kiran Kumari and Ankit Kumar who are present before this Court. It is submitted that the petitioner no. 1 has voluntarily performed marriage with the petitioner no. 2 without any coercion, duress or undue influence according to Hindu Customs & Rites. The petitioners are being unnecessarily harassed by the police personnel on the basis of false allegations made in the first information report lodged by the respondent no.4 who is the father of the petitioner no.1.

¶8

Per contra learned AGA contended that the allegations made against the petitioner no. 2 cannot be aborted at this stage. There is complicity of the petitioner no. 2 in the commission of the said crime. He is involved in the serious offence .

¶9

Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case and also from the bald perusal of the FIR, prima facie cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner no.2 at this stage hence there is no ground for interfering in the FIR, therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned FIR is refused.

¶10

However, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A., it emerges out that no reliable proof regarding the age of the petitioner no. 1 has been annexed with the petition, hence we direct her to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned within two weeks from today, who shall get her medical examination done within a week thereafter by the CMO concerned to ascertain her age. The age certificate will contain self attested photograph of petitioner no. 1. Thereupon, the I.O. concerned shall record the statement of petitioner no.1 under section 161 Cr.P.C. and also move an application before the C.J.M. concerned for getting her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., who shall record the same. The investigation officer shall provide her full protection.

¶11

It is further directed that the petitioner no.2 shall not be arrested in the aforesaid crime till the submission of the report under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C, subject to restraint that he shall cooperate with the investigation.

¶12

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

¶13

Order Date :- 20.12.2019 Shahnawaz

Kiran Kumari and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kiran Kumari and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivraj Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Umesh and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Abhishek Jain Jain and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others