Mohd. Arshad v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 26055 of 2019
Petitioner :- Mohd. Arshad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Sri Sunil Kumar Mishra holding brief of Sri Vinay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner has come up with the request that as he does not want to press this petition, same be dismissed as not pressed.
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed , but with no liberty.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 N.S.Rathour
Mohd. Arshad
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Naqvi
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court