Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR under various IPC sections. The court held that an offence was made out and the petition failed to show otherwise, dismissing the writ.
Petitioners cannot be granted relief for quashing of the impugned First Information Report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23463 of 2019
Petitioner :- Manju Devi And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amish Kumar Srivastava,Suresh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 16.11.2019 KA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the First Information Report alleging offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC deserves to be allowed to be quashed in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Whether the petitioners could show that no cognizable offence was made out from a perusal of the First Information Report.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Manju Devi And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
