Dismissing a Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition, the Court held that the petition lacked merit because the petitioner failed to establish its maintainability on the present showing, noting he claimed non-involvement in any criminal case.
None. The writ petition seeking directions against police harassment was dismissed for lack of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19933 of 2019
Petitioner :- Vikash Bali Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyam Narayan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Heard Sri Satyam Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri A.K. Saran, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
The relief sought in this petition is for issuing a direction to respondents and their subordinates not to harass or to adopt any coercive measures against the petitioner
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not involved in any of the criminal case but the police is harassing him.
We failed to understand as to how the present petition is maintainable on the own showing of the petitioner.
The petition lacks merit and is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Raj Beer Singh, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 26.7.2019 Neeraj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition is maintainable based on the petitioner's own showing given the lack of involvement in the alleged criminal case.
Vikash Bali
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Ramesh Sinha
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
