Smt. Sangita and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 46

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16996 of 2019

Petitioner :- Smt. Sangita And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Bhushan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 17.5.2019 registered as Case Crime No. 117 of 2019, under Sections 313, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Simbhawali, District Hapur .

¶7

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are being unnecessarily harassed on the basis of false allegations made against them while prima facie no cognizable offence is made out pursuant to the FIR lodged by the respondent no.3. Hence the FIR deserves to be quashed.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. contended that the allegations made in the first information report cannot be aborted at this stage. The petitioners will have sufficient opportunity to rebut the allegations.

¶9

From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out against the petitioners. The petitioners are involved in the serious offences hence no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioners. The prayer for quashing the FIR is refused.

¶10

The petition is accordingly dismissed.

¶11

However, it is provided that if the petitioners appear or surrender before the Court concerned within forty five days from today and apply for bail in the aforesaid case, their prayer for bail shall be considered by the court below expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶12

Order Date :- 26.6.2019

¶13

sfa/

Smt. Sangita and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sangita and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neha Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ramsaran Vs State of U P and Another

Luxman Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Nasreen Jahan Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Devendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sushil Tiwari and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others