Disposed

Jamuna Prasad and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC6 May 2019CRLP/12004/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR under IPC sections 147, 323, 504, and 325, holding that a cognizable offence was made out. However, the petitioner was granted a window of 60 days to surrender and apply for bail with immunity from coercive action, citing Supreme Court precedents.

What did the court decide?

Granted 60 days exemption from coercive action if petitioner surrenders and applies for bail; writ petition otherwise disposed of.

Jamuna Prasad and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 51

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12004 of 2019

¶3

Petitioner :- Jamuna Prasad And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Shahanshah Khan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

This writ petition has been filed with the prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F. I. R. which has been registered as Case Crime No. 102 of 2019, under Section- 147, 323, 504 and 325 IPC, P.S.Kotwali Dehat, district- Mirzapur.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the impugned first information report has been lodged by complainant containing absolutely false and concocted allegations against the petitioner(s) with the ulterior intention of harassing petitioner(s); apart from the bald allegations made in the impugned F. I. R., no evidence is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the complicity of the petitioner(s) in the commission of alleged offence and hence the impugned F. I. R. which is a bundle of lies and motivated by malice, is liable to be .

¶8

We have perused the FIR and from perusal of the allegations as made in the impugned F. I. R., it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out.

¶9

Reference may be made to the judgment of the Apex Court rendered in the case of R. Kalyani v. Janak C. Mehta and Others reported in 2009 (1) SCC 516. The said decision has also been followed by the Apex Court in the case of Kamlesh Kumari and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors. reported in 2015 AIR SCW 3700 .

¶10

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the impugned FIR and keeping in view the law as laid down by the Apex Court in the aforementioned cases, the Court is of the opinion that no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.

¶11

However, it is provided that in case petitioner appears and surrenders before the court below within 60 days from today and applies for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. For a period of 60 days from today or till petitioner surrenders and applies for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against petitioner. However, in case, petitioner does not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶12

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶13

Order Date :- 6.5.2019 Ujjawal

Jamuna Prasad and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jamuna Prasad and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dori Lal Sharma and Others Vs State of U.P.

Mahendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Raj Kumar Sharma and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Bhura and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Vanshi Lal Gupta and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Gaffar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others