Dhiresh @ Nate Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 46

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10365 of 2019

Petitioner :- Dhiresh @ Nate Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Prakash Misra,Prakash Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-IX,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 14.3.2019 registered as Case Crime No. 109 of 2019, under Section 272 IPC and Section 60 Excise Act, P.S. Gulriha, District Gorakhpur.

¶7

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is being unnecessarily harassed on the basis of false allegation made against him while prima facie no cognizable offence is made out pursuant to the FIR lodged by the respondent no. 3. Hence the FIR deserves to be quashed.

¶8

Per contra learned A.G.A. contended that the allegations made in the first information report cannot be aborted at this stage. The petitioner will have sufficient opportunity to rebut the allegations.

¶9

From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner. The petitioner is involved in the serious offences hence no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioner. The prayer for quashing the FIR is refused.

¶10

The petition is accordingly dismissed.

¶11

However, it is provided that if the petitioner appears or surrenders before the Court concerned within thirty days from today and applies for bail in the aforesaid case, his prayer for bail shall be considered by the court below expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶12

Order Date :- 19.4.2019 Shahnawaz

Dhiresh @ Nate v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhiresh @ Nate v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Minhaj and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ravi Shankar Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Sugriv Ram Yadav and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rajan and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Pappu and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ayyub Hafiz @ Jamani and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others