Single judge dated the Criminal Appeal defective filed by the convicted appellant regarding illegal electricity theft. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution after five years of pendency and upheld the conviction by Additional Sessions Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 50 of 2013
Appellant :- Babbu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Abdul Majeed,Gufran Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 38787 of 2013.
Order Date :- 4.1.2019 OP
Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 50 of 2013
Appellant :- Babbu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Abdul Majeed,Gufran Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Section 313 Cr.P.C. in which he denied the charges levelled against him.
Order Date :- 4.1.2019 OP
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal should be allowed or dismissed being defective and filed after a long delay.
Whether the conviction under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 is sustainable based on the evidence on record.
Babbu
State Of U.P.
Aniruddha Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
