Dismissed

Sadhu Saran Gupta and 2 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Anr.

Allahabad HC27 Sept 2019CRLA/6070/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court heard a criminal appeal seeking to quash a summoning order and proceedings. The appellants argued no offence was disclosed, while the State opposed. The court refused the quash plea but directed consideration of a bail application if made subsequently.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to quash the summoning order and entire proceedings refused; contingent direction for expedient bail consideration.

Sadhu Saran Gupta and 2 Ors. Vs State of U.P… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 71

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 6070 of 2019

¶3

Appellant :- Sadhu Saran Gupta And 2 Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Appellant :- Karuna Nand Tiwari,Amar Bahadur Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶6

This criminal appeal has been filed by the appellants with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated 29.08.2019 as well entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.137 of 2019 (Chhedi Vs. Sadhu Saran and others), in Special Sessions Trial No.295 of 2019, under Sections 323, 325, 354 IPC and Section 3(2)(V-a), 3(1)(d) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Paniyara, District Maharajganj.

¶7

As per the allegations made in the complaint, it is alleged that on 12.09.2018 at about 9:30 AM, the appellants, armed with lathi danda, reached at the house of the victim and abused him with the name of his caste with an intention to humiliate and intimidate him in public view and thereafter, when Paramjeet, wife of the victim rushed to rescue him, then she was also assaulted her and disrobed. On account of assault made by the appellants, victim Chhedi suffered injuries on his person and has been medically examined. The allegation of forcibly taken of Rs.2,000/- from his pocket has also been made.

¶8

Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that from the perusal of the allegations made in the complaint and the material collected during the course of inquiry, no offence is disclosed against the appellants and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He has pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.

¶9

Per contra, learned AGA has submitted that from the perusal of the allegations made in the complaint and the material collected during the course of inquiry, prima facie offence is clearly made out against the appellants and as such, impugned summoning order cannot be quashed.

¶10

Moreover, at this stage, only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex

¶11

Court in the cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another, (Para10) 2005 SCC (Cri.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage.

¶12

The prayer for quashing the summoning order and entire criminal proceedings is therefore refused.

¶13

However, it is directed that if the appellants appear/surrender before the court below and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties.

¶14

With the aforesaid observations, this criminal appeal is finally disposed of.

¶15

Order Date :- 27.9.2019 Nadim

Sadhu Saran Gupta and 2 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sadhu Saran Gupta and 2 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandaniya @ Rajveeri and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Anil Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramesh Pal Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Charan Chauhan and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dev Prasad and 2 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Rakesh Kumar and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.