Zaqir v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court reduced sentence of appellant Zaqir by disposing appeal per order dated 26.09.2016 in co-accused Param Singh's case (Crl. Appeal No. 653 of 2016) due to long incarceration.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed on same terms as order in Crl. Appeal No. 653 of 2016, reducing sentence.
What the court decided
Court No. - 80 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2831 of 2014 Appellant :- Zaqir Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Pawan Kumar Shukla,Ravi Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard Shri Ravi Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the appellant, Shri P.S. Mishra and Shri R.P. Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant has produced the order dated 26.09.2016 passed by another Bench of this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 653 of 2016 by which the matter of co-accused Param Singh was leniently viewed and quantum of sentence was reduced.
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that looking into the long period the accused-appellant is in jail, this Court may also take lenient view and the quantum of sentence of accused-appellant Zaqir may also be reduced.
Learned AGA has supported the finding of conviction and did not oppose the prayer for reduction of sentence.
Looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the long incarceration of accused-appellant in jail and also the view taken by another Bench of this Court in the matter of co-accused Param Singh, this appeal is also finally disposed of on the same terms and conditions as has been ordered vide order dated 26.09.2016 by another Bench of this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 653 of 2016.
Order Date :- 8.5.2019 /Bhanu
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Zaqir
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/2831/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court