Held a single-judge revision petitioner waived the hearing by non-appearance in revised call, resulting in dismissal for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 238 of 1998
Revisionist :- Mithlesh Kumar & Others Opposite Party :- Shri Prem Kumar & Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Pankaj Misra,Anupam Kulshrestha,Bd. Mandhyan,S. Mandhyan Counsel for Opposite Party :- R.N.Sharma
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
None appears to press the revision even in revised call.
The revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 2.1.2019 AM/-
Mithlesh Kumar
Shri Prem Kumar
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
