The Single Judge disposed of the contempt application as the impugned order was found complied with via an affidavit filed on 11.03.2014. Notices stood discharged.
Disposal of the contempt application and discharge of notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1006 of 2014
Applicant :- Shakuntala Devi And 6 Ors. Opposite Party :- M.K.S. Sundaram Housing Commissioner And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Umesh Vats,Mohd. Abrar Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.,Sunil Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
List have been revised. No one appears for the applicant in revised call. Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Advocate appearing for opposite parties.
From the affidavit of compliance filed on 11.03.2014, it is evident that the order in question has been complied with.
Consequently, nothing further survives in the contempt application and the same stands disposed of . Notices, if any, stand discharged.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019 A. Pandey
Shakuntala Devi And 6 Ors.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
