Dismissed bail cancellation application for want of prosecution due to absence of the applicant. No other substantive legal issues were addressed.
None; the bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 578 of 2017
Applicant :- Anil Kumar Dixit Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
None is present for the applicant even in the revised list/call. Learned AGA is present.
The bail cancellation application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 19.4.2019 P.P.
Anil Kumar Dixit
Aniruddha Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
