Learned counsel for applicant contended that applicant has been falsely implicated for dowry death with general allegations being Jeth of deceased; that as per averments made in F.I.R. lodged on 19.9.2018 by Narveer, his sister Mansi was married to Arjun on 29.4.2018 and since after marriage, she was being treated with cruelty for non fulfilment of demand of Car and on 19.9.2018, her dowry death was committed by accused-persons; that no specific role has been assigned to applicant regarding demand of dowry or treating deceased with cruelty for nonfulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant neither made any demand of dowry nor treated deceased with cruelty for nonfulfilment of demand of dowry; that applicant may not be beneficiary of Car allegedly demanded, as dowry; that applicant was living separately in separate portion of house with separate fooding; that post mortem report of deceased states that cause of death was asphyxia as a result of anti mortem hanging and there is no other anti mortem injuries on her person, except ligature mark and three minor/negligible contusions, which may be caused in the process of hanging; that following dispute between husband and wife, deceased appears to have committed suicide by hanging herself or was hanged by her husband; that case of applicant is distinguishable from Arjun, the husband of deceased; that applicant has no criminal history; that applicant undertakes that he will not misuse liberty of bail; that applicant is in custody since 1.10.2018.